Citation Codes Equivalent Citations citation codes Docket Number No. 75-273, CA 7429 Advocates Dean Heiling, Roseburg, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs was Heiling McIntosh, Roseburg. Eldon F. Caley, Roseburg, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Long, Neuner, Dole, Caley Kolberg, Roseburg. Judges ROBERTS, J., dissent. See more information ... Smart Summary Please sign up to generate summary. OPINION DIZICK, Appellant, v. UMPQUA COMMUNITY COLLEGE, Respondent. JOHNSON, J. Roberts, J., dissenting opinion. JOHNSON, J. This case was remanded to this court by the Supreme Court for reconsideration. In light of the decision in McBride v. Magnuson, 282 Or. 433, 578 P.2d 1259 (1978), we conclude that the majority and concurring opinions reported in Dizick v. Umpqua Community College, 33 Or. App. 559, 577 P.2d 534 (1978), are not inconsistent with McBride. We adhere to our original decision. Affirmed. ROBERTS, J., dissent. I dissent for the reasons stated in my dissenting opinion in Dizick v. Umpqua Community College, 33 Or. App. 559, 570, 577 P.2d 534, 539 (1978).