Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates

STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. EDWARD AUGUSTINE La RODA, Appellant.

PER CURIAM

Affirmed.

PER CURIAM

Defendant urges that the trial court abused its discretion in accepting his plea of guilty, because, he says, the record demonstrates that the plea was not voluntarily entered. The contention is not within the scope of review on direct appeal from a judgment of conviction entered pursuant to a guilty plea. ORS 135.050. If the trial court committed error, it was constitutional error and the remedy lies in a post-conviction proceeding. See generally, State v. Jairl, 229 Or. 533, 541-42, 368 P.2d 323 (1962); State v. Slopak, 3 Or. App. 532, 475 P.2d 421 (1970).

Affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

STATE v. La RODA
(Jan 26, 1981)