Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Advocates
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Advocates

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Appellant, v. JOSEPH OCASIO, Respondent

MEMORANDUM.

Order dismissing information affirmed.

Defendant was charged with criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree (Penal Law, § 265.01). Concededly, although defendant possessed only a "target permit", he was found in possession of the pistol when he was neither at nor in transit to or from a range. Defendant argues, however, that since he possessed a license, albeit limited in scope, he is immune from prosecution by virtue of subdivision 3 of section 265.20 Penal of the Penal Law. The People, on the other hand, maintain that possession of a weapon in violation of the terms and conditions of the license is tantamount to possession without a license.

Where, as here, the gravamen of the charge is "naked possession" as opposed to possession coupled with an intent to use the weapon unlawfully against another, the offense is not cognizable under section 265.01 Penal of the Penal Law, if the person had a license to possess the weapon. Rather, if the weapon was possessed in violation of the terms and conditions of the license the proper vehicle for prosecution is subdivision 15 of section 400.00 Penal of the Penal Law (see People v. Serrano, 71 A.D.2d 258, lv. to app granted 48 N.Y.2d 987).

Concur: PINO, P.J., JONES and KUNZEMAN, JJ.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. OCASIO
(Feb 11, 1981)