MASLONKA v. HERMANN, N.J., Judgment, Law, casemine.com

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Advocates

D. Scott Curzi argued the cause for appellant. Stephen J. Tafaro argued the cause for respondents Henry Hermann, M.D. and Volmar Mereschak, M.D. ( McDonough, Murray Korn, attorneys). Leonard Rosenstein argued the cause for respondent Tina Bastinelli ( Feuerstein, Sachs Maitlin, attorneys). Robert M. Graham argued the cause for respondent Elizabeth Boyle, R.N. ( Graham, Golden, Lintner Rothschild, attorneys).

Judges

PER CURIAM.
POLLOCK, J., dissenting.

See more information ...

Smart Summary

Please sign up to generate summary.

EDWIN E. MASLONKA, GENERAL ADMINISTRATOR AND ADMINISTRATOR AD PROSEQUENDUMOF THE ESTATE OF PATRICIA (GERSTENBERG) MASLONKA, DECEASED; ON BEHALF OF THEESTATE OF PATRICIA MASLONKA, DECEASED, AND EDWIN E. MASLONKA, INDIVIDUALLY,PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. HENRY L. HERMANN, M.D., INDIVIDUALLY; VOLMARMERESCHAK, M.D., INDIVIDUALLY; HENRY L. HERMANN, M.D., AND VOLMAR MERESCHAK,M.D., AS PARTNERS; ELIZABETH BOYLE, R.N., AND TINA BASTINELLI, R.N.,INDIVIDUALLY, JOINTLY OR SEVERALLY, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS, AND WARRENHOSPITAL, A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, AND PHYLLIS MARZUOLLI,R.N., INDIVIDUALLY, ETC., DEFENDANTS.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment below is reversed and the matter remanded to the Superior Court, Law Division, for trial, substantially for the reasons expressed in the dissenting opinion of Judge Milmed in the Appellate Division, reported at 173 N.J. Super. 566, 581 (1980).

POLLOCK, J., dissenting.

I would affirm the judgment below substantially for the reasons expressed in the majority opinion of the Appellate Division, reported at 173 N.J. Super. 566 (1980).

For reversal — Chief Justice WILENTZ and Justices SULLIVAN, PASHMAN, SCHREIBER and HANDLER — 5.

For affirmance — Justice POLLOCK — 1.

MASLONKA v. HERMANN

Comments