Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates
Judges

KUHN, APPELLANT, v. INTERSTATE MOTOR FREIGHT SYSTEM; INS. CO. OF N. AMERICA, SURETY, APPELLEE; MAYFIELD, ADMR., APPELLANT.

Workers' compensation — Surety for insolvent self-insured employer is "employer" within meaning of R.C. 4123.01(B), when — Surety may participate in benefit determination proceedings, when.

The judgment of the court of appeals in case No. L-85-212 is hereby affirmed on authority of Holben v. Interstate Motor Freight System (1987), 31 Ohio St.3d 152, 31 OBR 318, 509 N.E.2d 938, decided this date.

MOYER, C.J., SWEENEY, HOLMES, WRIGHT and H. BROWN, JJ., concur.

LOCHER and DOUGLAS, JJ., dissent.

LOCHER, J., dissenting.

I respectfully dissent for the reasons expressed in my dissent in Holben v. Interstate Motor Freight System (1987), 31 Ohio St.3d 152, 31 OBR 318, 509 N.E.2d 938.

DOUGLAS, J., concurs in the foregoing dissenting opinion.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

KUHN v. INTERSTATE MOTOR FREIGHT SYSTEM
(Jul 1, 1987)