Citation Codes Equivalent Citations citation codes See more information ... Smart Summary Opinion Summary Factual and Procedural Background This document is a short appellate entry concerning two matters captioned New York Times Co. v. Superior Court and Western Oil Gas Assn. v. Monterey Bay Unified Air Pollution Control Dist. It was filed by the Court of Appeal of California in 1988. The opinion states that review was granted and that the opinion was reprinted without change in 215 Cal.App.3d 672 to permit tracking pending review by the Supreme Court. A subsequent note refers to the Supreme Court opinion at 49 Cal.3d 408. No factual narrative of the underlying disputes is provided in the text supplied. Legal Issues Presented The opinion addresses a procedural matter and does not frame distinct legal issues. Arguments of the Parties The opinion does not contain a detailed account of the parties' legal arguments. Table of Precedents Cited Precedent Rule or Principle Cited For Application by the Court New York Times Co. v. Superior Court This information was not available in the provided opinion. This information was not available in the provided opinion. Western Oil Gas Assn. v. Monterey Bay Unified Air Pollution Control Dist. This information was not available in the provided opinion. This information was not available in the provided opinion. 215 Cal.App.3d 672 This information was not available in the provided opinion. The opinion was reprinted without change in 215 Cal.App.3d 672 to permit tracking pending review by the Supreme Court. 49 Cal.3d 408 This information was not available in the provided opinion. The opinion notes that review was granted and refers to 49 Cal.3d 408 for the Supreme Court opinion. Court's Reasoning and Analysis The supplied text contains minimal substantive analysis. Its procedural reasoning is that the Court of Appeal's opinion was reprinted without change to allow tracking while the matter was under review by the Supreme Court. The entry indicates that review was granted and points readers to the Supreme Court opinion citation. No additional step‑by‑step legal analysis or application of legal principles to facts is present in the provided excerpt. Holding and Implications Review granted; opinion reprinted without change in 215 Cal.App.3d 672 pending Supreme Court review (see 49 Cal.3d 408). Implications: The direct effect recorded in this entry is procedural—review by the Supreme Court was granted and the Court of Appeal's opinion was reprinted to permit tracking. The provided text does not discuss broader legal implications or the resolution on the merits, and it does not set forth any new precedent within the excerpt supplied. Show full summary ... OPINION New York Times Co. v. Superior Court and Western Oil Gas Assn.