Adjudged that the petition is granted, the determination is annulled, on the law, without costs or disbursements, and the respondents are directed to expunge from the petitioner's institutional record all references to the hearing and determination.
We agree with the petitioner's position that the Hearing Officer's determination placing him in involuntary protective custody (see, 7 N.Y.CRR former 304.1 [4] [b]; former 304.2 [b]; former 304.3 [c]) was not supported by substantial evidence. The determination was based primarily, if not exclusively, upon confidential information, the reliability of which was never personally assessed by the Hearing Officer (see, e.g., Matter of Wynter v. Jones, 135 A.D.2d 1032, 1033; Matter of Estrella v Coughlin, 131 A.D.2d 760; Matter of Alvarado v. LeFevre, 111 A.D.2d 475). Given the absence of sufficient reliable evidence in the record to support the Hearing Officer's determination, the petition should be granted, the determination annulled and all references thereto expunged from the petitioner's institutional record.
In light of the foregoing, we need not reach the petitioner's due process claim. Brown, J.P., Eiber, Sullivan and Harwood, JJ., concur.