Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Most of the issues raised by the defendant on this appeal have been considered and rejected by this court on the appeal of his codefendant Christopher Peters (see, People v Peters, 136 A.D.2d 750).
In view of the defendant's extensive history of criminal behavior and the seriousness of the crimes which evince his utter disregard for human life, we decline to reduce the sentences imposed in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction (see, People v Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80, 85-86; People v Roman, 84 A.D.2d 851).
We have considered the defendant's remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Brown, J.P., Sullivan, Harwood and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.