Defendant's unelaborated statement that he temporarily "moved into" the apartment where the search warrant was executed was insufficient to entitle defendant to a hearing on his motion to suppress the physical evidence, which included over six pounds of cocaine and drug paraphernalia stored in the refrigerator and closets (CPL 710.60). Defendant failed to establish a legitimate expectation of privacy in the areas searched, and thus lacked standing to challenge the execution of the warrant (People v Wesley, 73 N.Y.2d 351; People v Rodriguez, 69 N.Y.2d 159; People v Daniel, 152 A.D.2d 742). Entirely absent from defendant's statements in support of the motion to suppress were allegations of fact indicating the length and nature of defendant's temporary occupancy, the circumstances of the living arrangement, or any other indicia of an expectation of privacy in the areas searched.
Defendant was sentenced in accordance with his plea bargain and within statutory guidelines. Under these circumstances, we find no abuse of discretion by the sentencing court.
Concur — Carro, J.P., Kassal, Ellerin, Wallach and Rubin, JJ.