AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

JUDY BARDAZZI et al., Appellants, v. RICHARD SMOOK et al., Respondents.

The trial court did not abuse its discretion in requiring plaintiffs to pay each defendant costs of $1,200. The amendment of the complaint to include the cause of action for lack of informed consent was permitted about 10 years after the cause of action arose and after all previous discovery had been completed. Since that cause of action had not been discussed specifically during discovery, defendants should be reimbursed for any further discovery required on the matter. $1,200 is not excessive in light of amounts previously imposed by this Court (see, for example, Penick Co. v. Blue Comet Express, 81 A.D.2d 505, wherein permission to interpose an affirmative defense after only an 18-month delay was conditioned upon payment of costs of $1,000). Moreover, since each defendant has been represented separately by counsel in this matter, it was appropriate to require that each be paid $1,200.

Concur — Murphy, P.J., Ellerin, Wallach, Asch and Kassal, JJ.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

BARDAZZI v. SMOOK
(Jan 21, 1993)