Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number

STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. KATHALEEN LINARES

The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 32 Conn. App. 656 (AC 10910), is granted, limited to the following issues:

"1. Whether the defendant's motion to dismiss should have been granted because General Statutes 2-1d is overbroad, in violation of the Connecticut constitution and the United States constitution?

"2. Whether the defendant's motion to dismiss should have been granted because General Statutes 2-1d is vague on its face, in violation of the Connecticut constitution and the United States constitution?

"3. Whether the defendant's motion to dismiss should have been granted because General Statutes 2-1d is vague as applied in the instant case, in violation of the Connecticut constitution and the United States constitution?

"4. Whether the trial court should have granted the defendant's motion to dismiss because the state sought to punish her for political expression protected by the Connecticut constitution and the United States constitution?"

Timothy H. Everett, in support of the petition.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

STATE v. LINARES
(Nov 4, 1993)