Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.
The plaintiff, by failing to object to the verdict as inconsistent before the jury was discharged, did not preserve that argument for appellate review (see, Barone v City of Mount Vernon, 170 A.D.2d 557). In any event, the verdict was not inconsistent (see, Barry v Manglass, 55 N.Y.2d 803). Further, the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence, and the court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying a motion to set it aside (see, Rubin v Pecoraro, 141 A.D.2d 525; Nicastro v Park, 113 A.D.2d 129).
We have examined the plaintiffs' remaining arguments and find them either without merit, unpreserved for appellate review, or academic. Mangano, P.J., Sullivan, O'Brien and Ritter, JJ., concur.