Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates
Judges

STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. SCOTT CAVELL

FOTI, J.

This matter is before us on remand from our Supreme Court. We previously considered it in State v. Cavell, 34 Conn. App. 276, 641 A.2d 426, remanded for reconsideration, 231 Conn. 902, 645 A.2d 1021 (1994). The Supreme Court ordered us to reconsider our judgment in light of State v. Robinson, 230 Conn. 591, 646 A.2d 118 (1994). Having reconsidered, we affirm our prior judgment.

FOTI, J.

In this opinion HEIMAN, J., concurred.

O'CONNELL, J., dissenting.

For the reasons set forth in State v. Cavell, supra, 34 Conn. App. 295-303, ( O'Connell, J., dissenting), I adhere to my dissent from that decision.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

STATE v. CAVELL
(Oct 18, 1994)