Ordered that the order and judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
The plaintiff, a tenant-shareholder of the defendant cooperative-housing corporation, contends that the corporation improperly refused to allow him to continue to sublet his apartment. However, the proprietary lease in question contains a provision that allows the corporation to withhold its consent to subletting for any reason not proscribed by law or for no reason at all. Thus, the Supreme Court properly found in favor of the defendant (see, Caridi v. Markey, 148 A.D.2d 653; Miller v Swingle, 143 A.D.2d 984).
We have examined the plaintiff's remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Sullivan, J.P., Pizzuto, Santucci and Goldstein, JJ., concur.