Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant's claim that he was deprived of a fair trial because of the remarks made by the prosecutor during summation was not preserved for appellate review by his belated motion for a mistrial ( see, People v Narayan, 54 NY2d 106, 113-114; People v Maschi, 49 NY2d 784, 786; People v Johnson, 210 AD2d 174). In any event, consideration of this issue is not possible as it would require review of material which is dehors the record ( see, People v Bux, 144 AD2d 683, 683-684; People v Mosca, 131 AD2d 704).
The defendant's contention that the court's charge violated People v Antommarchi ( 80 NY2d 247, 251-252) and shifted the burden of proof, is also not preserved for appellate review ( see, People v Jackson, 76 NY2d 908, 909; People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620, 621; People v Thomas, 210 AD2d 10; People v Uraca, 195 AD2d 377).
The defendant's remaining contentions are unpreserved for appellate review and we decline to reach them in the exercise of our interests of justice jurisdiction.