AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Advocates
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Advocates
Judges

THE PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. KENRICK PRIMO, appellant. (Ind. No. 3822/97)

DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The trial court providently exercised its discretion in precluding the defendant from introducing evidence that the gun used during the shooting in this case was used three months later by a third party. While a defendant has a right to introduce evidence that a person other than himself committed the crime charged (see,Chambers v. Mississippi, 410 U.S. 284 ), that evidence must do more than raise a mere suspicion that another person committed the crime. In this case, the defendant failed to show a clear link between the third party and the crime in question (see, People v. Neal, 248 A.D.2d 406 ; People v. Griffin, 247 A.D.2d 550 ; People v. Wade, 245 A.D.2d 473 ; People v. McDonald, 231 A.D.2d 647 ; People v. Aulet, 111 A.D.2d 822 ).

MANGANO, P.J., BRACKEN, LUCIANO, and SMITH, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. PRIMO
(Mar 9, 2000)