AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Advocates
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Advocates

THE PEOPLE, ETC., RESPONDENT, v. EUGENE SINGLETARY, APPELLANT. (IND. NO. 11659/98).

DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed.

The defendant's purported waiver of his right to appeal the issue of the alleged excessiveness of his sentence was ineffective (see, People v. Rose [Simon], 236 A.D.2d 637; People v. Rolon, 220 A.D.2d 543). We have considered the defendant's contention that the sentence is excessive and find it to be without merit (see, People v. Allen, 269 A.D.2d 534; People v. Kazepis, 101 A.D.2d 816).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. SINGLETARY
(Dec 6, 2000)