Defendant's challenge to the court's reference, in its preliminary remarks to the prospective jury panel, to the elements of the crime charged is unpreserved and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. Were we to review this claim, we would find that there was no prejudice as the court cautioned against premature deliberations in its preliminary charge delivered prior to opening statements.
Defendant's right to a public trial was validly waived by defense counsel. After the court conducted a Hinton hearing and limited closure of the courtroom to the general public, allowing defendant's family and members of the legal profession to enter, during the testimony of an undercover police officer, defense counsel affirmatively agreed to similar closure during the testimony of a second undercover officer without an additional Hinton hearing. The right to a public trial may be waived by failure to make appropriate objection (see, People v. Pollock, 50 N.Y.2d 547, 550; People v. Marathon, 97 A.D.2d 650; see also, Levine v. United States, 362 U.S. 610, 619).
We perceive no basis for reduction of sentence.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.