AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates

SUHAS TAVKAR, et al., respondents, v. ILONA-BORIS CAB, appellant, et al., defendant.

DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements..

A motion for summary judgment must be made within 120 days of the filing of a note of issue "except with leave of court on good cause shown" (CPLR 3212[a]; see, Gonzalez v. 98 Mag Leasing Corp., 95 N.Y.2d 124, 128-129; Olzaski v. Locust Val. Cent. School Dist., 256 A.D.2d 320, 321). The appellant's summary judgment motion, filed more than 120 days after the filing of the note of issue, was untimely. Moreover, it was made without leave of the court and without good cause shown for the delay (see, Torres v. Westchester Dental Services, 287 A.D.2d 710 [2d Dept., Oct. 29, 2001]; Clifford v. Harrow Stores, 274 A.D.2d 370, 371; Olzaski v. Locust Val. Cent. School Dist., supra). Accordingly, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the motion as untimely.

RITTER, J.P., GOLDSTEIN, FRIEDMANN, FEUERSTEIN and CRANE, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

TAVKAR v. ILONA-BORIS CAB
(Dec 3, 2001)