PHILIPP v. STAHL

Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Report a problem

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

A-56 September Term 2001

Advocates

James G. O'Donohue argued the cause for appellant (Hill Wallack, attorneys). Anthony B. Vignuolo argued the cause for respondent (Borrus, Goldin, Foley, Vignuolo, Hyman Stahl, attorneys
Jack Borrus
Peter A. Vignuolo, of counsel
on the brief).

Judges

PER CURIAM

Are you a practicing lawyer?

Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.

Upload pleading to use the new AI search

Click here to upload

Cites

PHILIPP v. STAHL

Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Jun 12, 2002

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

A-56 September Term 2001

Advocates

James G. O'Donohue argued the cause for appellant (Hill Wallack, attorneys). Anthony B. Vignuolo argued the cause for respondent (Borrus, Goldin, Foley, Vignuolo, Hyman Stahl, attorneys
Jack Borrus
Peter A. Vignuolo, of counsel
on the brief).

Judges

PER CURIAM

See more information ...

Smart Summary

Please sign up to generate summary.

CLAIRE PHILIPP, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. ROBERT STAHL,Defendant-Appellant.

PER CURIAM

The judgment of the Appellate Division is reversed, substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Wecker's dissenting opinion, reported at 344 N.J. Super. 274 (2001).

CHIEF JUSTICE PORITZ and JUSTICES STEIN, COLEMAN, LONG, VERNIERO, LaVECCHIA, and ZAZZALI join in this opinion.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

CLAIRE PHILIPP, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. ROBERT STAHL,Defendant-Appellant.

Comments