AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates
Judges

IN THE MATTER OF GERALD WRIGHT, petitioner, v. SHELDON GREENBERG, ETC., ET AL., respondents.

Application by the respondent Charles J. Hynes to dismiss the proceeding.

ORDERED that the application for poor person relief is granted to the extent that the filing fee imposed by CPLR 8002(b) is waived and the application is otherwise denied as academic; and it is further,

ORDERED that the application to dismiss the proceeding is granted; and it is further,

ADJUDGED that the petition is denied and the proceeding is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

"Because of its extraordinary nature, prohibition is available only where there is a clear legal right, and then only when a court — in cases where judicial authority is challenged — acts or threatens to act either without jurisdiction or in excess of its authorized powers" (Matter of Holtzman v. Goldman, 71 N.Y.2d 564, 569; see Matter of Rush v. Mordue, 68 N.Y.2d 348, 352). Similarly, the extraordinary remedy of mandamus will lie only to compel the performance of a ministerial act, and only when there exists a clear legal right to the relief sought (see Matter of Legal Aid Society of Sullivan County v. Scheinman, 53 N.Y.2d 12, 16).

The petitioner failed to demonstrate a clear legal right to the relief sought.

O'BRIEN, J.P., FRIEDMANN, McGINITY and H. MILLER, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

IN THE MATTER OF WRIGHT v. GREENBERG
(Jul 8, 2002)