AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates
Judges

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, v. ROBERT ROBINSON, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

The existing record reveals that defendant received meaningful representation at all stages of the proceedings including his motion to withdraw his guilty plea, and that the motion was properly denied (see People v. Benevento, 91 N.Y.2d 708, 713-714; People v. Ford, 86 N.Y.2d 397, 404). Counsel's initial statement that he had known of no legal basis upon which to move to withdraw the plea did not amount to ineffective assistance of counsel where defendant himself had not provided any such basis (see People v. Diaz, 282 A.D.2d 272, lv denied 96 N.Y.2d 917). In any event, counsel ultimately made a written motion to withdraw the plea. Counsel was under no obligation to raise meritless issues in that motion (cf. Jones v. Barnes, 463 U.S. 745), and, contrary to defendant's argument on appeal, there is nothing in the record to suggest that there were any meritorious issues to raise.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. ROBINSON
(Sep 19, 2002)