Plaintiff alleges that defendants-respondents, who are his former wife's brother and attorneys, colluded with his former wife to have him falsely arrested for domestic violence so as to give her an "unfair advantage" in the divorce case they were planning against him. Whatever roles respondents may have played in bringing about plaintiff's arrest, fair notice thereof is not provided by his allegations, aptly characterized by the motion court as "unspecific and unfocused," that they gave the former wife "aid," "encouragement," "support" and "advice" (CPLR 3013; 3016[b]). We have considered and rejected plaintiff's other claims.
Motion seeking leave to file a late reply brief and for other related relief denied.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.