AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates
Judges

ED A. CRAPO, as Property Appraiser of Alachua County, Florida, VON FRASER, as Tax Collector for Alachua County, Florida, and JIM ZINGALE, as Director of the Florida Department of Re v. nue, Petitioners,

PER CURIAM.

Petitioners sought to dismiss the City of Gainesville's complaint below, asserting that it constituted a challenge to a tax assessment, but that the trial court lacked subject matter jurisdiction because the complaint had not been filed within the 60-day statute of nonclaim set forth in section 194.171(2), Florida Statutes (2001). The trial court declined to dismiss the complaint, finding that it was a challenge to the property appraiser's tax classification of the property at issue, rather than to a tax assessment, and that section 194.171(2) was thus inapplicable. We conclude that the trial court erred in so holding. See Ward v. Brown, 28 Fla. L. Weekly D731 (Fla. 1st DCA Mar. 13, 2003),review granted, 848 So.2d 1157 (Fla. July 14, 2003). Accordingly, the petition for writ of prohibition is granted, the order denying the motions to dismiss is quashed, and the matter is remanded to the trial court with directions to dismiss the City's complaint.

PETITION FOR WRIT OF PROHIBITION GRANTED.

WEBSTER, DAVIS and BROWNING, JJ., concur.

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

CRAPO v. CITY OF GAINESVILLE
(Sep 18, 2003)