AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates
Judges

In the Matter of the Claim of RALPH ESPOSITO, Appellant. COMMISSIONER OF LABOR, Respondent.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

By decision dated and mailed May 24, 2002, claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits on the ground that he voluntarily left his employment without good cause and was assessed a recoverable overpayment of benefits. Although claimant received the decision shortly after it was mailed and read the back of it, he failed — according to his testimony — to file an appeal until June 24, 2002 because his efforts were focused on his new job. Notwithstanding claimant's proffered excuse for failing to comply with the strict 20-day statute of limitations period set forth in Labor Law § 621 (1), we find no reason to disturb the decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board which dismissed claimant's appeal as untimely (see Matter of Del Valle [Commissioner of Labor], 285 A.D.2d 888). Claimant's attempt to argue the underlying merits of the denial of his application for unemployment insurance benefits is, therefore, not properly before this Court (see id.).

Cardona, P.J., Peters, Spain, Mugglin and Rose, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

IN THE MATTER OF CLAIM OF ESPOSITO
(Dec 11, 2003)