AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates
Judges

IN THE MATTER OF THE CLAIM OF MICHELLE SHAYO, Appellant. COMMISSIONER OF LABOR, Respondent.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Substantial evidence supports the decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board finding that claimant voluntarily left her employment as an accounts receivable/data entry clerk without good cause. On the day in question, claimant was told by her supervisor that she was to work until 4:20 P.M., allowing her to leave three hours before sunset in observance of the Jewish holy day. Despite a denial by her supervisor and the owner of the company of her request to leave earlier, claimant left work for a medical appointment at 3:00 P.M. Leaving work early without authorization in disregard of a supervisor's directive can disqualify a claimant from receiving unemployment insurance benefits (see e.g. Matter of Gorton [Genesee County Ch. NYSARC — Commissioner of Labor], 1 A.D.3d 682; Matter of Unterman [Commissioner of Labor], 293 A.D.2d 801, 802) and can be construed as job abandonment. The conflicting testimony as to whether claimant left at the end of her scheduled shift presented a credibility issue for the Board to resolve (see Matter of Tordsen [Commissioner of Labor], 287 A.D.2d 935, 936;Matter of Diallo [Commissioner of Labor], 263 A.D.2d 608).

Spain, J.P., Mugglin, Rose, Lahtinen and Kane, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

IN THE MATTER OF SHAYO
(Feb 19, 2004)