AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates
Judges

MADISON HUDSON ASSOCIATES LLC, ET AL., Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. JOSEPH NEUMANN, ET AL., Defendants-Appellants.

Issues of fact exist, precluding summary judgment, inter alia, the specific terms of a joint venture agreement between the parties; the possible modification thereof by the November 13 letter agreement; and the conduct of the Achenbaum defendants. With respect to the alleged fraudulent conveyance, the determination of insolvency, or what constitutes fair consideration under Debtor and Creditor Law § 273, is generally one of fact to be determined by the circumstances of a particular case ( Matter of American Inv. Bank v. Marine Midland Bank, 191 A.D.2d 690, 691-92).

We have considered defendants' remaining arguments and find them to be without merit.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MADISON HUDSON ASSOCS. v. NEUMANN
(Feb 24, 2004)