MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
Substantial evidence supports the decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board ruling that claimant voluntarily left her employment as a telemarketer without good cause. The record establishes that shortly after accepting a part-time job as a telemarketer, claimant was absent from work due to an injury she sustained at home. Following her recovery, claimant contacted her manager and informed him that she needed full-time employment in order to meet her financial obligations. When her request was not honored, claimant failed to return to work. It is well settled that neither dissatisfaction with the number of hours assigned by an employer (see Matter of Cudnik [Sweeney], 235 A.D.2d 888, 888) nor the amount of wages paid (see Matter of Bollweg [Commissioner of Labor], 288 A.D.2d 811; Matter of Burman [Comissioner of Labor], 288 A.D.2d 539, 540) constitutes good cause for leaving employment, particularly where, as here, claimant agreed to part-time employment when hired (see Matter of Orlik [Commissioner of Labor], 257 A.D.2d 837; Matter of Cudnik [Sweeney], supra). Claimant's remaining contentions, including that her departure was not voluntary and she did not receive an impartial hearing, have been reviewed and found to be without merit.
Mercure, J.P., Spain, Rose, Lahtinen and Kane, JJ., concur.
ORDERED that the decision is affirmed, without costs.