AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges

WILLIAM LAUX, Plaintiff v. CITY OF OAK GROVE, Defendant.

ORDER

THOMAS RUSSELL, District Judge

Upon Cross Motions for Summary Judgment (Dkt. Nos. 12 16), responses and replies (Dkt. Nos. 19, 20, 22), and the Court being sufficiently advised,

IT IS ORDERED:

Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. # 16) is GRANTED. The Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. # 12) is DENIED.

On or before December 20, 2004, Plaintiff shall file a brief for the violation of Mr. Laux's right to due process. Defendant shall respond within 15 days. Plaintiff may reply within 10 days thereafter. Plaintiff shall notify the Court in writing with a copy to opposing counsel, when the motion is ripe.

A telephonic conference is set for February 24, 2005 at 1:00 p.m.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

LAUX v. CITY OF OAK GROVE
(Dec 1, 2004)