Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates

State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee v. Anthony James Moore, Defendant and Appellant.

Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

[¶ 1] Anthony James Moore appeals from the district court's denial of his motion to correct an illegal sentence. Moore argues: (1) he was improperly required to register as a sexual offender for life under a statute that does not apply to him; (2) he was required to register as a sexual offender erroneously because he is "actually innocent"; and, (3) he was denied due process by being sentenced to pay restitution without receiving notice.

[¶ 2] Moore's claims are frivolous and completely without merit. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(1).

[¶ 3] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Carol Ronning Kapsner

Mary Muehlen Maring

Daniel J. Crothers

Dale V. Sandstrom

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

STATE v. MOORE
(Sep 27, 2005)