Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number

Mid-Am. Fire Cas. Co. v. Heasley.

MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS

On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. The parties are to brief the issues stated at page 5 of the court of appeals' Judgment Entry filed January 23, 2006:

"Whether an insurer may maintain a declaratory judgment action pursuant to R.C. 2721.01 et seq. to determine the rights of patties to an automobile accident under the terms and conditions of the contract for insurance even though the injured party is currently barred from seeking coverage because the authority supporting the insured party's claim for coverage was superseded by new authority.

"Whether a trial court's order dismissing a declaratory judgment complaint is an order reviewed under an abuse of discretion standard or a de novo review."

RESNICK, PFEIFER and O'DONNELL, JJ., dissent.

Sua sponte, cause consolidated with 2005-2399, Mid-Am. Fire Cas. Co. v. Heasley, Lake App. No. 2004-L-115, 2005-Ohio-6072.

The conflict case is Indiana Ins. Co. v. Forsmark, Lorain App. No. 04CA008520, 160 Ohio App.3d 277, 2005-Ohio-1635.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MID-AM. FIRE CAS. CO. v. HEASLEY
(Mar 29, 2006)