Ordered that the order of disposition is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the presentment agency ( see Matter of Takeya B., 304 AD2d 825, 826; Matter of Stafford B., 187 AD2d 649, 650), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish beyond a reasonable doubt that the appellant committed acts which, if committed by an adult, would have constituted the crimes of criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree ( see Matter of Rosario S., 18 AD3d 563) and menacing in the third degree ( see Matter of John F., 12 AD3d 509, 510; Matter of Ramon M., 109 AD2d 882, 883). Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the findings of fact were not against the weight of the evidence ( cf. CPL 470.15).