Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number

Char v. t

MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS

On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. The parties are to brief the issue stated in the court of appeals' Journal Entry filed September 8, 2006:

"Whether a defendant `knowingly' violates Section 227(b), Title 47, U.S. Code, or the regulations promulgated thereunder, for purposes of awarding treble damages under Section 227(b)(3), where the plaintiff demonstrates that the defendant had knowledge of the facts constituting the offense; or whether the plaintiff must prove that the defendant knew when it placed the offending call that the call constituted a violation of the TCPA [Telephone Consumer Protection Act] or any regulations promulgated thereunder."

O'DONNELL, J., dissents.

The conflict case is Reichenbach v. Financial Freedom Ctrs., Inc., Lucas App. No. L-03-1357, 2004-Ohio-6164.

Sua sponte, cause consolidated with 2006-1647, Charvat v. Ryan, Franklin App. No. 05AP-1331, 2006-Ohio-3705 and 2006-Ohio-4592.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

CHARVAT v. RYAN
(Nov 29, 2006)