Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates
Judges

State v. Boring.

EISENHAUER, J.

On direct appeal from his convictions of second-degree sexual abuse and lascivious acts with a child, Larry Dean Boring contends his trial counsel was ineffective in: (1) failing to object to the admission of hearsay that violated his right to confrontation; (2) failing to object to the admission of evidence of other bad acts; (3) failing to object to testimony regarding the victim's truthfulness; and (4) failing to object to prosecutorial misconduct occurring during his cross-examination and during the closing argument. As the record is not fully developed with respect to these claims, we preserve them for possible postconviction relief. See Berryhill v. State, 603 N.W.2d 243, 245 (Iowa 1999) (stating ineffectiveness claims raised on direct appeal are ordinarily preserved for postconviction relief to allow full development of the facts surrounding counsel's conduct).

AFFIRMED.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

STATE v. BORING
(Apr 11, 2007)