Ordered that the order is affirmed.
The Supreme Court properly denied the defendant's motion pursuant to CPL 440.30 (1-a) for DNA testing of evidence. The defendant failed to allege any facts demonstrating that, if DNA test results had been admitted at the trial resulting in the judgment, there exists a reasonable probability that the verdict would have been more favorable to him ( see People v West, 41 AD3d 884; People v Simpson, 35 AD3d 901; People v Mixon, 30 AD3d 1103).