AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates
Judges

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. WILLIAM E. WILLIAMS, Appellant.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The defendant's contention that the Supreme Court improperly assessed points for both the age of the victim and the incapacity of the victim is unpreserved for appellate review ( see People v Await, 17 AD3d 336; People v Angelo, 3 AD3d 482; People v Baker, 303 AD2d 570). In any event, the contention is without merit ( see People v Stevens, 48 AD3d 536; People v Davenport, 38 AD3d 634; People v Vaughn, 26 AD3d 776). The court providently exercised its discretion in denying the defendant's request for a downward departure.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. WILLIAMS
(Oct 14, 2008)