AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates
Judges

EVELYN PAULINO, Respondent, v. LIFECARE TRANSPORT et al., Appellants.

Plaintiffs action is barred by the exclusivity of the remedy under Workers' Compensation Law § 11. JHHA submitted evidence demonstrating that defendants, as well as plaintiff's nonparty employer, were all part of a single integrated entity in that they operated under the control of the same parent corporation, shared payroll services and an employee manual, and were covered by the same workers' compensation insurance policy ( see Hernandez v Sanchez, 40 AD3d 446; Ramnarine v Memorial Ctr. for Cancer Allied Diseases, 281 AD2d 218). Although Lifecare failed to submit documentary evidence in support of its motion, we find that it is entitled to summary judgment based upon the documentation submitted by JHHA.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PAULINO v. LIFECARE TRANS
(Dec 16, 2008)