Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates
Judges

GAIL R. O'CONNELL-BABCOCK, Plaintiff, v. MULTNOMAH COUNTY, OREGON, MICHAEL OSWALD, JOHN ROWTON, LINDA POWERS, LIZ KLOBUCIK, SHANNON JAMES, JENNY HOLMAN, STEPHANIE COLLINGSWORTH, TRACEE STEWART, JOHN AND JANE DOES 1-10, Defendants.

ORDER

GARR KING, District Judge

The Honorable John Acosta, United States Magistrate Judge, filed Findings and Recommendation on March 25, 2009. Plaintiff filed timely objections to the Findings and Recommendation.

When either party objects to any portion of a magistrate's Findings and Recommendation concerning a dispositive motion or prisoner petition, the district court must make a de novo determination of that portion of the magistrate's report. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Business Machines, Inc., 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 920 (1982). This court has, therefore, given de novo review of the rulings of Magistrate Judge Acosta.

This court ADOPTS the Findings and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Acosta dated March 25, 2009 in its entirety.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants' Motion to Strike (#20) is denied. Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (#12) is granted.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

O'CONNELL-BABCOCK v. COUNTY
(Apr 24, 2009)