Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates
Judges

Raymond E. VOGT, Jr., Petitioner-Appellant, v. COMMISSIONER of INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent-Appellee.

MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Raymond E. Vogt, Jr., appeals pro se from the tax court's decision in favor of the Internal Revenue Service ("IRS") in his action seeking a redetermination of his 2000-2003 federal income taxes and additions to tax. We have jurisdiction under 26 U.S.C. § 7482(a)(1). We review the Tax Court's findings of fact for clear error and its conclusions of law de novo. Hardy v. Comm'r, 181 F.3d 1002, 1004 (9th Cir. 1999). We affirm.

The tax court properly deemed stipulated the Commissioner's proposed facts after Vogt refused to stipulate to facts based on his asserted Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination. See Tax Ct. R. 91(f)(3); Edelson v. Comm'r, 829 F.2d 828, 832 (9th Cir. 1987) (explaining that a taxpayer cannot refuse to cooperate with the IRS based on a generalized fear of self-incrimination).

Vogt's contention that the IRS was required to notify him of his duty to maintain his income records or his duty to file taxes is without merit. See Cracchiola v. Comm'r, 643 F.2d 1383, 1385 (9th Cir. 1981).

Vogt's remaining contentions are unpersuasive.

AFFIRMED.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

VOGT v. COMMISSIONER
(Jul 8, 2009)