Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates
Judges

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Ernesto HERNANDEZ-PEREZ, Defendant-Appellant.

PER CURIAM:[fn*] [fn*] Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Defendant-Appellant Ernesto Hernandez-Perez appeals his 24-month sentence for transporting illegal aliens for financial gain. The district court enhanced the sentence pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2L1.1(b)(6) after it determined that Hernandez-Perez intentionally or recklessly created a substantial risk of death or serious bodily injury to the aliens he transported. Hernandez-Perez contends that the circumstances of his offense do not warrant the sentence enhancement.

We review a district court's interpretation of the Guidelines de novo and reviews its factual findings for clear error. See United States v. Solis-Garcia, 420 F.3d 511, 514 (5th Cir. 2005). It is undisputed that Hernandez-Perez transported fifteen persons in a vehicle rated to carry seven passengers and that thirteen of his passengers lacked safety restraints and were "lying on top of each other" in the vehicle's rear compartment. As the commentary to § 2L1.1 gives "carrying substantially more passengers than the rated capacity of a motor vehicle or vessel" as an example of reckless conduct that would support a sentence enhancement under that Guideline, we perceive no error in Hernandez-Perez's sentence. See § 2L1.1, comment. (n. 5).

AFFIRMED.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

U.S. v. HERNANDEZ-PEREZ
(Feb 18, 2010)