AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates
Judges

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. TOMAS PECK, Appellant.

Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law, the plea is vacated, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, for further proceedings in accordance herewith.

The plea minutes reveal that the defendant was not informed, prior to entering his plea, that postrelease supervision was required to be part of any sentence with a determinate prison term. Therefore, the judgment must be reversed and the plea must be vacated ( see People v Hill, 9 NY3d 189, 191 [20071, cert denied 553 US 1048; People v Louree, 8 NY3d 541, 544-545; People v Catu, 4 NY3d 242; People v Lindsay, 72 AD3d 845, 846; People v Wilcox, 70 AD3d 1059; People v Curry, 65 AD3d 1373; People v Key, 64 AD3d 793; People v Gibbs, 61 AD3d 699). Accordingly, we remit the matter to the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, for further proceedings on the indictment, including a new plea, if the defendant be so advised.

In light of our determination, the defendant's remaining contention has been rendered academic.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. PECK
(Nov 30, 2010)