Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Contrary to the defendant's contention, the accomplice's testimony was sufficiently corroborated ( see CPL 60.22; People v Reome, 15 NY3d 188, 194; People v Cortez, 81 AD3d 742).
The defendant's contention that the Supreme Court erred in its jury instruction for the conspiracy count is not preserved for appellate review ( see CPL 470.05), and we decline to reach it in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction.