Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates
  • Charles Darby Riley, Esq., Riley Riley, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiffs-Appellants. Marcie Lynn Schout, William Lance Lewis, Esq., Gregory Marshall Sudbury, Esq., Quilling, Selander, Cummiskey Lownds, P.C., Jonathan M. Herman, Middleberg, Riddle Gianna, Kirsten Marisol Castaneda, Senior Counsel, Daron L. Janis, Esq., Locke, Lord, Bissell Liddell, L.L.P., Dallas, TX, Mark Douglas Cronenwett, Esq., Lindsay Leever Stansberry, Higier, Allen Lautin, P.C., Addison, TX, Lindsay Lee Lambert, Esqv Hughes, Watters Askanase, L.L.P., Houston, TX, Benjamin David Lee Foster, Locke, Lord, Bissell Liddell, L.L.P., Austin, TX, for Defendants-Appellees.
Judges
  • Edith Hollan Jones
  • Patrick Errol Higginbotham
  • Leslie Southwick
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Click here to upload
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates
  • Charles Darby Riley, Esq., Riley Riley, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiffs-Appellants. Marcie Lynn Schout, William Lance Lewis, Esq., Gregory Marshall Sudbury, Esq., Quilling, Selander, Cummiskey Lownds, P.C., Jonathan M. Herman, Middleberg, Riddle Gianna, Kirsten Marisol Castaneda, Senior Counsel, Daron L. Janis, Esq., Locke, Lord, Bissell Liddell, L.L.P., Dallas, TX, Mark Douglas Cronenwett, Esq., Lindsay Leever Stansberry, Higier, Allen Lautin, P.C., Addison, TX, Lindsay Lee Lambert, Esqv Hughes, Watters Askanase, L.L.P., Houston, TX, Benjamin David Lee Foster, Locke, Lord, Bissell Liddell, L.L.P., Austin, TX, for Defendants-Appellees.
Judges
  • Edith Hollan Jones
  • Patrick Errol Higginbotham
  • Leslie Southwick
See more information ...
Smart Summary

Lorena G. BOUTARI; James R. Cabaniss; Patsy N. Cabaniss, Wife; Angelita Flores; Gur v. s Guillory; et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants

PER CURIAM:[fn*] [fn*] Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

The court has carefully considered the briefs, oral argument, and pertinent portions of the record. After such review, we have determined that the judgment of the district court should be affirmed for essentially the reasons set forth by the district court. Boutari v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., No. 5:09-cv-00608, doc. 88 (W.D. Tex. June 10, 2010) (Order Accepting Report and Recommendation).

AFFIRMED.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.
Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

Comments

BOUTARI v. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK N.A
(Jun 20, 2011)