AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates

BRANCH BANKING AND TRUST COMPANY v. PEACOCK FARM, INC., Rodolphe T. Lynch, and Willard A. Rhodes.

Howard, Stallings, From, Hutson, Atkins, Angell & Davis, P.A., by John N. Hutson, Jr., Raleigh, and Matthew M. Lawless, for plaintiff-appellee.

Van Camp, Meacham & Newman, PLLC, Pinehurst, by William M. Van O'Linda, Jr., for defendant-appellant Rodolphe T. Lynch.

Opinion

Appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A–30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, ––– N.C.App. ––––, 772 S.E.2d 495 (2015), dismissing an interlocutory appeal from an order entered on 5 June 2012, as certified under Rule of Civil Procedure 54(b) by an order entered on 16 April 2014, both by Judge Anderson D. Cromer in Superior Court, Moore County. Heard in the Supreme Court on 17 November 2015.

PER CURIAM.

For the reasons stated in the majority opinion, the decision of the Court of Appeals is affirmed. We remand this case to the Court of Appeals for further remand to the

trial court so that additional proceedings may be held not inconsistent with the opinion.

AFFIRMED AND REMANDED.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Branch Banking & Trust Co. v. Peacock Farm, Inc.
(Dec 18, 2015)