Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Advocates
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Advocates
Judges

    Kalinga Combines Pvt. Ltd. And Another v. Odisha Industrial Infrastructure Development Corporation (Idco) And Others Opposite Parties.

    1. The principal contention of the Petitioners is that the Opposite Parties have arbitrarily changed the conditions of the contract and are acting contrary thereto in seeking to withdraw the earlier commitment to pay the GST amount under the contract in question.

    2. Relying on the judgment in ABL International Ltd. v. Export Credit Guarantee Corporation of India Ltd., (2004) 3 SCC 553, Mr. G. Rath, learned counsel appearing for the Petitioners, insists that the writ petition is maintainable.

    3. Subject to question of maintainability, issue notice to the Opposite Parties.

    4. Opposite Party No. 4 is not a necessary party to the present dispute and is accordingly deleted. The amended cause title be filed within one week.

    5. Notice be issued to the Opposite Party No. 1 to 3 by Registered Post/Speed Post with A.D. making it returnable by the next date. Requisites be filed within a week. Tracking report be placed on record by the next date.

    6. List after twelve weeks.

    I.A. No. 15659 of 2021

    7. All actions taken by the Opposite Parties in the meanwhile will be the subject to the outcome of the writ petition. The application is disposed of.

    8. An urgent certified copy of this order be issued as per rules.

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    Kalinga Combines Pvt... v. Odisha Industrial In...
    (Nov 3, 2021)