AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Advocates
Acts
  • Section 21(5) of the National Investigation Agency (NIA) Act read with Section 5 of Limitation Act,
  • Sections 13, 16, 18, 20 UAPA, 1967; Sections 25, 54 & 59 of Arms Act and Sections 109, 324(5), 48, 238, 132, 221, 61(2) of BNS (Section 111 BNS
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Advocates
Acts
  • Section 21(5) of the National Investigation Agency (NIA) Act read with Section 5 of Limitation Act,
  • Sections 13, 16, 18, 20 UAPA, 1967; Sections 25, 54 & 59 of Arms Act and Sections 109, 324(5), 48, 238, 132, 221, 61(2) of BNS (Section 111 BNS
To access the original judgment, please Sign In or Subscribe.

    SUKHDEV KUMAR @ SUKHDEV SINGH @ MANISH BEDI v. STATE OF PUNJAB

    208 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

    AT CHANDIGARH

    CRA-D-909-2026 (O&M) Date of decision : 01.07.2026 SUKHDEV KUMAR @ SUKHDEV SINGH @ MANISH BEDI ....Appellant

    versus

    STATE OF PUNJAB .....Respondent

    CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BHARDWAJ

    Present :- Ms. Diksha Mahajan, Advocate for the appellant.

    Mr. Raj Karan Singh, A.A.G., Punjab.

    RAJESH BHARDWAJ, J. (Oral) CRM-23443-2026

    Allowed as prayed for.

    CRM-23444-2026

    Present application has been filed under Section 21(5) of the National Investigation Agency (NIA) Act read with Section 5 of Limitation Act, seeking condonation of delay of 06 days in filing the present appeal.

    For the reasons mentioned in the application, delay of 06 days in filing the present appeal, is hereby condoned. Application stands allowed.

    Main case

    1. Present appeal has been filed for setting aside the impugned order dated 15.04.2026 passed by ld. Additional Sessions Judge, Amritsar vide which regular bail application of the appellant in case FIR No.58

    1

    CRA-D-909-2026 (O&M) -2-

    dated 27.04.2025 registered under Sections 13, 16, 18, 20 UAPA, 1967; Sections 25, 54 & 59 of Arms Act and Sections 109, 324(5), 48, 238, 132, 221, 61(2) of BNS (Section 111 BNS added later on) at Police Station PS Ramdas, Amritsar has been declined.

    2. Status report by way of affidavit of Mr. Gurdeep Singh, PPS, Deputy Superintendent of Police, Sub-division Ajnala, Amritsar along with custody certificate of the appellant, has been filed on behalf of respondent-State in the Court today, same is taken on record.

    3. After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the appellant submits that she does not want to press the present appeal, at this stage.

    4. Dismissed as not pressed, at this stage.

    ( RAJESH BHARDWAJ )

    JUDGE

    01.07.2026 (DEEPAK MANCHANDA)

    ps-I JUDGE

    Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No

    2

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    SUKHDEV KUMAR @ SUKHDEV SINGH @ MANISH BEDI v. STATE OF PUNJAB
    (Jul 1, 2026)