Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Neutral Citations
2026 KER 19853
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Advocates
Judges
Acts
  • Section 85(2) of the Kerala 4 Land Reforms Act.
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Neutral Citations
2026 KER 19853
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Advocates
Judges
Acts
  • Section 85(2) of the Kerala 4 Land Reforms Act.
To access the original judgment, please Sign In or Subscribe.

    KADEEJA, v. THE TAHSILDAR

    2026:KER:19853

    IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

    PRESENT

    THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.M.MANOJ

    THURSDAY, THE 5TH DAY OF MARCH 2026 / 14TH PHALGUNA, 1947

    WP(C) NO. 30678 OF 2019

    PETITIONER/S:

    1 KADEEJA,

    AGED 55 YEARS

    W/O.LATE UNNI MAMMED, VATTATH HOUSE,

    KONDOTTY P.O., MALAPPURAM.

    2 JAMSHIYA K.M.,

    AGED 34 YEARS

    D/O.LATE UNNI MAMMED, VATTATH HOUSE,

    KONDOTTY P.O., MALAPPURAM.

    3 JUVAIRIYA,

    AGED 32 YEARS

    D/O.LATE UNNI MAMMED, VATTATH HOUSE,

    KONDOTTY P.O., MALAPPURAM.

    4 JASEERA K.M.,

    AGED 31 YEARS

    D/O.LATE UNNI MAMMED, VATTATH HOUSE,

    KONDOTTY P.O., MALAPPURAM.

    5 SHAMEEL K.M.,

    AGED 29 YEARS

    S/O.LATE UNNI MAMMED, VATTATH HOUSE,

    KONDOTTY P.O., MALAPPURAM.

    6 SHIHAB K.M.,

    AGED 28 YEARS

    S/O.LATE UNNI MAMMED, VATTATH HOUSE,

    KONDOTTY P.O., MALAPPURAM.

    7 RASHEEDA,

    AGED 24 YEARS

    D/O.LATE UNNI MAMMED, VATTATH HOUSE,

    KONDOTTY P.O., MALAPPURAM.

    1

    2

    8 NASIDA T.K.,

    AGED 28 YEARS

    W/O.LATE SARAFUDDIN, VATTATH HOUSE,

    KONDOTTY P.O., MALAPPURAM.

    9 FATHIMA MEHNA,

    AGED 7 YEARS

    (MINOR) REPRESENTED BY MOTHER AND GUARDIAN NASIDA

    T.K., 8TH PETITIONER, VATTATH HOUSE,

    KONDOTTY P.O., MALAPPURAM.

    0 K.M.MAMMED,

    AGED 62 YEARS

    S/O.LATE CHERIYAMMUTTY HAJI, KALPALLY HOUSE,

    MUNDAPPALAM P.O., KONDOTTY, MALAPPURAM.

    BY ADVS.

    SHRI.P.V.ANOOP

    SRI.PHIJO PRADEESH PHILIP

    SHRI.ABIN BENNY

    SHRI.K C MOHAMED RASHID

    SHRI.DENNISE JACOB SAVY

    RESPONDENT/S:

    1 THE TAHSILDAR,

    KONDOTTY, MALAPPURAM- 673638.

    2 THE TALUK LAND BOARD,

    REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN, TALUK LAND BOARD,

    KONDOTTY, MALAPPURAM- 673638.

    3 THE VILLAGE OFFICER,

    KONDOTTY VILLAGE, MALAPPURAM- 673638.

    4 STATE OF KERALA,

    REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF LAND

    REVENUE, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM- 695001.

    THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON

    05.03.2026, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

    3

    JUDGMENT

    Dated this the 5thday of March, 2026 The writ petition has been filed aggrieved by the issuance of Ext.P1 notice, whereby the petitioners are directed to surrender the excess land held by them.

    2. In fact, the issue involved in this case is that one Cheriyammutty Haji made a gift of properties measuring 7.45 acres under Ext.P2 gift deed to his five sons, and after death of the said sons, the petitioners and others have been holding the property independently. The deceased Unni Mammed filed O.S. No.19 of 1997 before the Sub Court, Manjeri, against the 2ndrespondent and the State of Kerala for a declaration that the said gift deed is real and valid.

    3. However, the suit was dismissed by the Sub Court, Manjeri, against which the petitioners have filed RFA No.292 of 2016 before this Court. Even during the pendency of the RFA, the 6thpetitioner has preferred a representation before the 2ndrespondent Taluk Land Board, under Section 85(2) of the Kerala

    4

    Land Reforms Act. Now, the counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners will be satisfied if the 2ndrespondent considers the said representation within a time frame

    Taking note of the limited prayer sought at this point, I deem it appropriate to dispose of the writ petition with a direction to the 2ndrespondent to consider and pass appropriate orders on Ext.P3 representation dated 02.03.2026 after affording the petitioners an opportunity of being heard, as expeditiously as possible. Sd/-

    P.M.MANOJ

    JUDGE

    sss

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    KADEEJA, v. THE TAHSILDAR
    (Mar 5, 2026)