Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Advocates
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Advocates
Judges
To access the original judgment, please Sign In or Subscribe.

    Santosh Kumar v. Naresh Kumar And 2 Others

    HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

    FIRST APPEAL FROM ORDER No. - 967 of 2026

    Court No. - 39

    HON'BLE ABDUL SHAHID, J.

    1. Heard learned counsel for the appellant.

    2.The present appeal has been filed for enhancement of the award dated 28.01.2026

    passed by Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, in Claim Petition No. 354 of 2022

    (Santosh Kumar Versus Naresh Kumar and others).

    3. As per Section 168 of the Motor Vehicles Act, the award has to be based on just

    compensation; however, no amount can truly compensate for the loss of life or human

    organs. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal is required to award just compensation,

    which should be neither a bonanza nor a windfall. The learned Tribunal has

    considered all the relevant issues and assessed the income of the injured at Rs. 9,530

    per month as an unskilled worker, along with a 40% enhancement towards loss of

    future prospects, as per settled law.

    4. The entire claim has been awarded for an amount of Rs. 33,07,310/- along with

    interest at the rate of 7% per annum. An appeal for enhancement must be supported by

    reasonable and cogent grounds, it should not be filed as it has been filed.

    5. The learned Tribunal has awarded reasonable and just compensation in accordance

    with Section 168 of the Motor Vehicles Act and the law settled by the Hon'ble

    Supreme Court..

    6. In view thereof, the present appeal is not entitled to be admitted. It is liable to be

    dismissed at the stage of admission itself.

    7. The appeal is dismissed accordingly.

    April 27, 2026 K.K. Maurya

    Versus

    Counsel for Appellant(s) : Krishna Mohan Rai Counsel for Respondent(s) :

    (Abdul Shahid,J.)

    Santosh Kumar .....Appellant(s)

    Naresh Kumar And 2 Others .....Respondent(s)

      1. 2026-04-27T16:29:33+0530
      2. High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    Santosh Kumar v. Naresh Kumar And 2 Others
    (Apr 27, 2026)