Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Advocates
Judges
Acts
  • Co-operative Societies Act, 1959 and the Rules
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Advocates
Judges
Acts
  • Co-operative Societies Act, 1959 and the Rules
To access the original judgment, please Sign In or Subscribe.

    MR MANJUNATHA A v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

    - 1 -

    HC-KAR

    NC: 2026:KHC:17093

    WP No. 9624 of 2026

    IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

    DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF MARCH, 2026

    BEFORE

    THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.9624 OF 2026 (CS-RES)

    BETWEEN:

    1. MR. MANJUNATHA A.

    S/O ANDYAPPA,

    AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS,

    R/AT LAKKURU HOBLI,

    MALUR TALUK, PURA,

    KOLAR-563160.

    SHARE NO. 149.

    2. MR. MUTHAPPA,

    S/O PAPPANNA,

    AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS,

    R/AT LAKKURU HOBLI,

    MALUR TALUK, PURA,

    KOLAR- 563160.

    SHARE NO. 28

    3. MR. CHIKKAPAPANNA

    S/O MUTHARAYAPPA,

    AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS,

    R/AT LAKKURU HOBLI,

    MALUR TALUK, PURA,

    KOLAR-563160.

    SHARE NO. 26

    4. MR. RAJANNA,

    S/O NARAYANAPPA,

    - 2 -

    AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS,

    R/AT LAKKURU HOBLI,

    MALUR TALUK, PURA,

    KOLAR-563160.

    SHARE NO. 121

    5. MR. CHANDRAPPA S.,

    S/O SONNAPPA,

    AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS,

    RAT NO. 34, LAKKURU HOBLI,

    MAHAR TALUK, PURA, KOLAR-563160

    SHARE NO. 15

    THE PETITIONERS ARE THE

    THE MEMBERS OF THE

    RESPONDENT NO.7-L PURA MILK PRODUCERS CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD.,

    LAKKURU.

    MALURU TALUK,

    KOLAR DISTRICT-563160. …PETITIONERS

    (BY SRI. K.M. PRAKASH, ADVOCATE)

    AND:

    1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

    DEPARTMENT OF CO-OPERATION,

    M. S. BUILDING.

    DR. B. R. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI,

    BENGALURU-560001,

    REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.

    2. THE STATE CO-OPERATIVE ELECTION COMMISSION, 3RDFLOOR, T.T.M.C 'A' BLOCK,

    SHANTHI NAGAR, K.H. ROAD,

    - 3 -

    BENGALURU -560027,

    REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER.

    3. THE REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES

    NO.1, ALI ASKAR ROAD,

    BENGALURU-560001.

    4. THE DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE ELECTION OFFICER, AND DEPUTY REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE

    SOCIETIES,

    KOLAR DISTRICT-563160.

    5. THE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE

    SOCIETIES

    LAKKURU HOBLI,

    MALURU TALUK,

    KOLAR DISTRICT-563160.

    6. THE RETURNING OFFICER

    THE L PURA MILK PRODUCERS CO OPERATIVE

    SOCIETY LTD.,

    LAKKURU HOBLI,

    MALURU TALUK,

    KOLAR DISTRICT-563160.

    7. THE SECRETARY

    THE L PURA MILK PRODUCERS CO OPERATIVE

    SOCIETY LTD.,

    LAKKURU HOBLI,

    MALURU TALUK,

    KOLAR DISTRICT-563160. …RESPONDENTS

    (BY SRI. YOGESH D. NAIK, AGA FOR R1, R3 TO R6)

    - 4 -

    THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226

    AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO

    QUASH THE CALENDAR OF EVENTS DATED 18/03/2026

    PUBLISHED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.6 PRODUCED AT

    ANNEXURE-A; DIRECTING THE RESPONDENTS TO POSTPONE

    THE ELECTIONS BY RESCHEDULING THE CALENDAR OF

    EVENTS.

    THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY

    HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

    CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH

    ORAL ORDER

    1. In this Writ Petition, petitioners are assailing the calendar of events dated 18.03.2026 published by respondent No.6 (Annexure-A), inter alia, sought for a direction to the respondents to postpone the election by re-scheduling the calendar of events.

    2. Heard learned counsel appearing for the parties.

    3. Sri. K.M. Prakash, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners argued that political leaders are participating in the jatra / festival and it would be difficult for the petitioners herein

    - 5 -

    to participate in the election in view of jatra / karaga festival as per Annexure-B.

    4. Per contra, Sri. Yogesh D. Naik, learned Additional Government Advocate appearing for the respondent - State, argued that the calendar of events has been issued in adherence to the Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, 1959 and the Rules framed therein and therefore, no interference is called for in this Writ Petition.

    5. Having taken note of the submissions made by the learned counsel appearing for the parties, I am of the view that, since the calendar of events has been issued on 18.03.2026, following the declaration of law in the case of N. P. Ponnuswami Vs. Returning officer, Namakkal Constituency and Others, reported in AIR 1952 SC 64, no interference is called for in this Writ Petition.

    6. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of.

    SD/-

    (E.S.INDIRESH)

    JUDGE

    sac List No.: 2 Sl No.: 2

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    MR MANJUNATHA A v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
    (Mar 25, 2026)