AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Advocates
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Advocates
Judges
To access the original judgment, please Sign In or Subscribe.

    M/S BHUSHAN METTALICS LTD. v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANR.

    IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

    AT CHANDIGARH

    ****

    201 CWP-5425-2003 Date of Decision: 13.11.2025

    M/S BHUSHAN METTALICS LTD. ...Petitioner Vs.

    STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANR. …Respondents

    CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PARMOD GOYAL

    Present:- Mr. Rohit Jain, Advocate (through V.C.) with Mr. Abhishek Sharma, Advocate

    for the petitioner

    Mr. Aman Dhir, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab Mr. A.P. Bhandari, Advocate with

    Ms. Bhargavi, Advocate

    for the respondent No.2

    ***

    JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL)

    1. On 04.11.2025, the following order was passed by this Court:-

    "Learned counsel for the petitioner pointed out judgment dated 26.09.2025 of Hon'ble Supreme Court passed in Civil Appeal No.1808 of 2020 titled as 'Kalyani Transco Vs. M/s Bhushan Power and Steel Limited and Ors.' and Resolution Plan approved by NCLT. In view of orders passed by NCLT and Appellate Tribunal which stand upheld by Hon'ble Supreme Court, the Resolution Plan stands approved. New management has taken over business of the petitioner.

    On being pointed out that amount involved is Rs.7,00,000/-, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks time to get instructions.

    Adjourned to 13.11.2025."

    1 of 2

    CWP-5425-2003 -2-

    2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of amount involved, the petitioner does not press the petition, however, question of law may be kept open.

    3. Learned State counsel does not oppose the aforesaid prayer.

    4. Dismissed as withdrawn.

    5. It is made clear that we have not expressed any opinion on merit and question of law involved herein is left open.

    6. Pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of.

    (JAGMOHAN BANSAL)

    JUDGE

    (PARMOD GOYAL)

    JUDGE

    November 13, 2025

    Deepak DPA Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No

    2 of 2

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    M/S BHUSHAN METTALICS LTD. v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANR.
    (Nov 13, 2025)